President Obama and Governor Romney
used their respective convention speeches to establish their separate visions
for the role of president, create or reinforce their personal images, and
appeal to both their current supporters and undecided voters. While they shared many of the same approaches
to rhetoric, they also managed to produce a very clear distinction between
their political views. The candidates
took slight jabs at one another, yet they remained respectful and dignified in
their actions. In terms of representing
themselves to their base audience, I think that both candidates presented their
views successfully. It is my personal
opinion that viewers of the two conventions generally have their minds made up
as to who they will choose, but President Obama and Governor Romney formed
effective arguments for why they deserve the undecided individual’s vote. President Obama was slightly more effective
in his speech simply because of his rhetorical skills, as well as the
already-established image of himself that resulted from his first term in
office.
President Obama
Overall: 8 (out of 10)
Effectiveness to
their “base” audience: 9 - As far as appealing to his “base” audience,
President Obama managed to say all the right things. One of the most effective parts of President
Obama’s speech came from his acknowledgement of the role of his
supporters. Obama referred back to his
first campaign and addressed the audience by saying, “You were the change”. I think this effectively stirred the emotions
of the Democrats in the audience and empowered them to go out and vote on
November 6. There were many instances
throughout President Obama’s speech where the energy of the room seemed to
spike tremendously. He articulated his
key points in a manner that raised tension and ultimately brought their
audience to their feet. I think the
Democrats left the convention feeling proud of the way that President Obama
spoke to the nation and hopeful for his reelection.
Effectiveness in
appealing to undecided voters: 7 - Obama entered the campaign with the
advantage (or possibly disadvantage) of an already developed image of himself
due to his first four years in office.
Individuals all over the country recognize President Obama’s name, and
they could probably tell you all kinds of rumors about his history. Even for individuals that do not support
Obama’s policies, it’s hard to keep from admiring him as an individual. His rhetorical skills allow him to develop
messages that people want to believe regardless of whether or not they truly
believe him. Obama remained poised and
collected while at the podium, and I think this resonated in their minds of
undecided voters. Instead of seeing a
man on stage clawing away at the core of his opponent, Obama was respectful in
his attacks and continued to set the stage for sharing his vision of the United
States. When President Obama said “you
elected me to tell you the truth”, I feel that this quote definitely resonated
within the minds of individuals still unsure of their vote. Instead of focusing strictly on his political
mission, President Obama appealed to the human nature of individuals and the
values that they have in common.
Governor Romney
Overall: 7 (out of 10)
Effectiveness to
their “base” audience: 8 – Like President Obama, Governor Romney delivered
a quality speech that focused on exactly what his audience wanted to hear. By referring to American heroes like Neil
Armstrong and Steve Jobs, Governor Romney continued to stress his ideas of
normality among himself and his principles.
The speech incorporated a long list of facts and figures that the
Republican audience can refer to as real and tangible data. It may be in the best interest of the
audience to follow up with fact checkers regarding Governor Romney’s use of
logos, but I feel that it effectively appealed to his followers. During his speech, the presidential
candidate also cited specific companies that he helped start. These companies, such as Staples and Sports
Authority, were examples of widely-known businesses that American people
recognize. I think that in terms of
persuading Republicans to visit the voting booths in November, Govern Romney
provided solid references and points that give Republicans good reason to
believe in the candidate as their presidential nominee.
Effectiveness in appealing
to undecided voters: 6 – Governor Romney had the task of introducing
himself to voters that are unfamiliar with him on the national scene, as well
as putting forth explanations of his own policies and procedures. While he did a decent job of balancing these
two goals during his speech, I think this ultimately limited his effectiveness
in appealing to undecided voters. Also, I
felt Governor Romney’s reliance on facts and figures didn’t appeal to undecided
voters in a persuasive way. It would
take a combination of logos, pathos, and egos to convince voters that he
deserves their vote, and Governor Romney didn’t focus enough time or energy on
each concept. If anyone was to make
their decision over the specific convention speeches, it would be the
individuals that find relevance within Governor Romney’s belief that “We
celebrate success; we don’t apologize for success”. In the end, I felt that Governor Romney didn’t
do a whole lot to help himself gain an advantage from new voters, but he didn’t
do much to hurt himself in the long run either.
No comments:
Post a Comment